Comparing Different Variants Of Batman Film Analyses Essay
My aim for this essay is to analyse and do a comparison of different versions of the Batman film. I’ve decided to compare the 1966 “Batman” to the 1989 “Batman” and “The Dark Knight”, which was released in 2008. I wish to appear at how these movies have been made, how ‘Batman’s’ status has changed through the years and how they assess to the original comic books.
Batman made his initial overall look in Detective Comics in 1939; he was the ‘caped crusader’ who gone against the criminals of the underworld who killed his father and mother. In the early comics, the drawings confirmed ‘a grim tone and ‘nourish’ utilization of bold blocks of dark ink’ (Sabin, 1996, p.61). However, down the road the comics ‘were progressively lightened to be able to draw a younger romance; a pattern which culminated in the 1960’s where the comics started to be ‘camp’ comedies to reflect the amazingly successful tv series’ (Sabin, 1996, pp. 61-62).
Wikipedia (2008) Man Who Laughs [Online] Offered by: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Manwholaughs.jpg (Accessed: 3rd December 2010)
BD Comics (1999) Batman- No Mans Territory [Online] Available at: http://bdcomics.bdgamers.net/2007/06/13/batman-no-mans-terrain/ (Accessed: 3rd December 2010)
The 1966 ‘Batman’ was a film adaptation of the 60’s Television series; it had spending plan of $1,377,800. In the film, there happen to be no shots of skyscrapers or any properties that resemble the landscapes in the comic books. The costumes in this film are basic; the villains are dressed in matches and Batman and Robin’s outfits look cheaply made, when compared to most recent film; this reveals the difference in budget. The make-up is quite basic; the ‘Joker’ has a ghostly white face and red drawn on smile; no prosthetics are being used on him. The ‘Penguin’ includes a prosthetic nose to create it freakishly very long and pointy, nevertheless the rest of the characters have normal daily make-up on.
The fight moments in the film happen to be unrealistic, fake punches will be thrown between personas, with words such as “URKK” and “OUCH” entering the shot is big letters:
“The TV show was absolutely dopey, humor and slapstick substituting for anything remotely violent or suspenseful. It also presented the surreal ‘bonk’/’zap’ subject cards to amplify the fun”. (Gibron, 2008)
This will make the fighting glance comical and amusing. However it does match the comic book design of fighting and was that which was acceptable to be shown in the film and TV series at that time.
Still from TV 1960’s series ‘Batman’ (1966) Batman Generation : Batman 1960’s TV Series [Online] Available at: http://movie-collections-on-dvd.blogspot.com/ (Accessed: 10th November 2010)
The sidekick ‘Robin’ appears in this film. I think his presence makes Batman look fewer macho, it implies that he needs back up, this may have been the reason he wasn’t written into the series of films that followed decades later. In comparison to films today; it is extremely naive, in a single scene a very toy looking shark is used as a prop and in the Bat cave every machine or device is labelled.
Heath, R (2008) The Dark Knight 2010 [Online] Offered by: http://www.ferdyonfilms.com/?m=200807 (Accessed: 3rd December 2010)
Clara, H (2010) Entertainment [Online] Offered by: http://www.mylifetime.com/lifestyle/entertainment/lewis-wilson-michael-keaton-and-val-kilmer-batman (Accessed: 3rd December 2010)
In 1989 ‘Batman’ was released, it was the first of a series of feature movies starring Batman which were produced by the Warner Bros; it got a budget of $35,000,000. This film strayed from the 1966 ‘camp’ variant, ‘Beyond Hollywood’ emphasises this point volume for square pyramid by saying:
“Before 1989, unless you were an avid comic book reader, you probably seen Batman as a clownish superhero, trading punches and quips with bad guys with his youthful assistant Robin faithfully at his side. He was campy, a lttle bit dull, rather than dangerous. That is, before summer of 1989, when Tim Burton arrived to changed all that.” (Beyond Hollywood, 2004)
Gotham City is certainly dark and gothic seeking; the buildings are dingy and aged. The forms of the properties resemble the comic reserve images; they don’t appear to be any usual American city. Lots of smoke is used in the environment, it reminds me of backdrops in a theatre development.
The joker likewise matches perfectly with the comic reserve illustrations; the make-up cleverly permits the actor to get a fixed smile. He places on a present and prides himself on staying theatrical, using joke shop type gags, i.e. a flower that squirts poisonous gas and a buzzer how to start a personal narrative which he attaches to his hands to electrocute his victim. The music, which is normally enjoyed as a backing to the joker, is almost the same as you may notice in the circus, everything about any of it is comical.
Neumaier, J. (2008) Jack Nicholson warned Overall health Ledger on ‘Joker’ part[Online].Available at: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2008/01/24/2008-01-24_jack_nicholson_warned_heath_ledger_on_jo.html (Accessed: 31 October 2010)
Newsrecord. (2008)Heath Ledger Was Changed by playing ‘The Joker'[Online]. Available at: http://www.inoutstar.com/news/Heath-Ledger-Was-Changed-by-Playing-The-Joker-6583.html#nimg_16437 (Accessed: 31 October 2010)
‘The Dark Knight’ (2008) was directed by Christopher Nolan and experienced a spending budget of $185,000,000. When posting the film, screenwriter David S. Goyer got influences from a few comic books instead of just one. Within an interview he said:
“I think that there are elements from The Dark Knight, factors from The Long Halloween, factors from The Killing Joke. But it’s not like we were specifically adapting one particular comic reserve or comic book arc.” (Goyer, 2008)
In this film the joker has apprentices who will be masked like clowns. These masks are very eerie; they permit the characters to come to be emotionless and wintry; only showing the single expression that is drawn on the mask.
Batman’s fight scenes are bold and highly choreographed; this is a large comparison to the joker’s design of fighting, which is quite rash. This film is dominated by the Joker identity; his scarred face is messily covered with make-up offering him a clown-like persona. This persona is confirmed by his greasy, green tinged hair, dark eyes, smudged roughly outwards and his crimson creepy smile. His drawn on smile is certainly covering heavy badly raised marks. The light make-up which addresses his encounter is uneven and usually looks worn. His costumes will be odd, purple velvet fits with a green shirt; this enables him to stand out against others, who largely wear classic suits. Costume Designer, Lindy Hemming, wanted to generate a “younger trendier glance, so as to represent Ledger’s era”(Hemming, 2008). This outfit also matches the comic books. His character is usually fearless and chillingly calm; I think this creates a great atmosphere and bears the film.
Sound has a huge impact on this variant of the film; dramatic music is normally played in the background, ticking noises are as well commonly used, symbolising the rapid passing of time. However there are many pictures in the film which have no backing music or noises for example; this is a large contrast to the rest of the film and cleverly makes a maximum impact. A definite shot can be of the Joker hanging himself out of a stolen law enforcement car that he is driving, I discover this picture very chilling.
After enjoying a documentary about the composer’s thoughts behind a few of the music, I learnt that the noises are based on the ‘Joker’ character:
“Pictures and clips were utilized to create music that matched the joker’s movements and personality. Punk influences were applied and tones and noises were produced employing two clashing notes of the cello, to provide the come to feel of razorblades.” (Zimmer, 2008)
The sounds will be unsettling and the composer wanted to create a sound which demonstrated rising pressure.
Uhlich, K (2008) Trickster Heaven, Two Face Hell: The Dark Knight [Online] Available at: http://www.slantmagazine.com/house/2008/07/trickster-heaven-two-faced-hell-the-dark-knight/ (Accessed: 3rd December 2010)
Another hugely important identity is Harvey Dent. He is Gotham’s golden boy who, by the finish of the film, because of the ‘Joker’s’ text; ‘I took Gotham’s light knight and brought him down’, has been converted into a villain, Two Face. The consequences for ‘Two Deal with’ were made out of ‘digital make-up’, basically high make use of CGI.
A lot of shots in the setting up are of properties, the camera pans large above lots of skyscrapers as a link between scenes. The villains seem
to continually be lit darkly, where in fact the lighting has a blue tinge.
In conclusion, as the years pass, technology improves and the budget for the films increase, which I think is due to the increase in film reputation. Each film stays authentic to the comics in various methods; the 1966 ‘Batman’ is normally most like the comics in the fight scenes where they are quite graphical, with sounds entering the screen in text. Nevertheless the make-up and costume doesn’t match and doesn’t give enough of an impact. The 1989 ‘Batman’ will match very well to the comic book images, make-up and costume-wise. It also has a great collection which matches the structures of Gotham city and really provides feel that they are residing in the comics. ‘The Dark Knight’s special results are by far the best and in my judgment I think the acting is most beneficial in this film.
The joker is an essential character in every three versions, particularly 1989 ‘Batman’ and ‘The Dark Knight’. It is just a matter of personal judgment which version is the best, however I trust Slant magazine in preferring Health Ledger’s chilling version:
“Eighteen years after Jack Nicholson’s over-praised, distinctly Jack-ish personification of the dastardly purple-clad jester in Tim Burton’s Batman, Ledger returns the type to his demented The Killing Joke graphic novel roots, conjuring up a transfixing, indelible portrait of our most detrimental terrorist-extremist nightmares.” (Schager, 2008)
‘The Dark Knight’s acting and gothic think matches well with the original comics, before these were made more camp to match the ‘1960’s’ market. The make-up takes a different direction in order to avoid copying Tim Burton’s film, this however meant they had a need to steer away somewhat from the comic literature. Overall, in order to achieve an ideal film version of the batman comics, you would need to incorporate, 1989’s make-up, costume and set with ‘The Dark Knight’s’ music, special results and acting.